Thursday, September 18, 2008

Father testifies at son's murder trial


Sentinel Staff Writer
4:33 PM EDT, September 18, 2008

A "good child" who played Little League baseball became an emotionless loner and compulsive health fanatic in the six months before he killed a middle school classmate, his father testified Thursday.

Michael Hernandez had been a typical boy who played sports and had friends who visited the house, Jesus Hernandez said.

But in the summer of 2003, when the boy was 13, he withdrew from friends and family, his father said.

"He didn't seem to want to go to dinner with us on weekends or auctions (with me) like he had gone to before. He basically wanted to stay in his room," said the elder Hernandez, 60, who ran a business liquidation business.

"He wasn't making eye contact with us," he said.

Michael Hernandez, now 18, is accused of murdering Jaime Gough in a bathroom stall at Southwood Middle School in Miami in February 2004. He also is charged with attempting to kill another classmate, Andre Martin.

In a videotaped confession played for the jury Monday, Hernandez, then 14, described slashing Gough's throat and stabbing him. He also said he had tried to lure Martin into the same stall a day earlier to strangle and stab him.

He faces life in prison if convicted. His trial was moved from Miami because of extensive media coverage.

Defense attorney Richard Rosenbaum has argued that Hernandez was and is insane and not criminally responsible for the slaying.

Prosecutors have said Hernandez meticulously planned to kill Gough, Martin and his own sister.

Jesus Hernandez said Thursday he was surprised when police presented him with his son's journal, in which the teen detailed plans for the three killings.

Police had found the journal in the teen's backpack with a knife and bloody latex gloves.

"We never in our lives thought he was capable of such a thing," he said. "He was raised as a loving child in a loving family."

Michael Hernandez developed elaborate rituals, such as eating the same sandwich for lunch every day and riding his bicycle for a half-hour after dinner, rain or shine, his father said.

Jesus Hernandez said he and his wife thought their son was just going through an adolescent transition. The teen asked his parents for permission to use body building supplements, which were approved by a doctor. He consistently got good grades, but his parents broached the subject of getting him psychological help in the fall of 2003.

He said his son refused to talk to a psychologist, and the family agreed to revisit the issue in January 2004.

His son's strange behavior continued up to his 14th birthday on Feb. 2, 2004, the day before Gough's slaying.

"It was the first day he didn't want a birthday party," Jesus Hernandez said.

Man gets life in prison for killing Haines City police officer


Amy L. Edwards Sentinel Staff Writer
4:00 PM EDT, September 18, 2008

The triggerman convicted of killing a Haines City police officer 10 years ago was sentenced to life in prison Thursday, the U.S. Attorney's Office said.

Charles Fowler, 29, is the fourth person to be convicted in Christopher Todd Horner's death.

Horner was found dead March 3, 1998, slumped on the ground at the Oakland Cemetery. The rookie police officer was shot in the back of the head with his own handgun.

Authorities have said Fowler and several other men were getting ready to rob a bank when Horner approached them.

A federal jury in Tampa found Fowler guilty June 17. Three other men convicted in Horner's murder -- Christopher B. Gamble, Andre Paige and Robert Winston -- have already been sentenced to life in prison.

Woman gets life sentence for sex with 5-year-old boy


Rene Stutzman

Sentinel Staff Writer

4:28 PM EDT, September 18, 2008

A Sanford jury today convicted a 33-year-old woman of having sex with a 5-year-old boy.

Kelly Lumadue was then sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Jurors on Tuesday watched videotape of the sex acts. They happened 12 years ago when Lumadue, then 21, lived in Longwood with her husband, a professional pornographer who recorded the session. He has since died.

Kelly Lumadue testified yesterday, telling jurors that she had performed those sex acts under duress from her husband.

She wasn't arrested until 2003, seven years after the recordings were made. That's when a garbage collector found the tapes in a box at the curb outside Lumadue's Volusia County home. They were among videotapes she had thrown out.

This was Lumadue's second trial on those charges. A jury last year found her guilty of the same charges, but a judge ordered a new trial, citing possible juror misconduct and overly-aggressive questioning by a prosecutor.

Michael Hernandez jury watches emotionless confession


BY LISA ARTHUR

The videotape shows then-14-year-old Michael Hernandez telling a Metro-Dade detective how he slit the throat of a classmate in a bathroom at Southwood Middle School four years ago. His voice is flat and emotionless and he shows no sign of nerves. His answers are methodical and clinical as he describes how he lured Jaime Gough into a bathroom stall.

'I told him, `I have to put my hand over your mouth,' '' Hernandez told Detective Salvatore Garafalo just hours after Jaime's death. ``And I did. And I lifted his neck up. . . . I slit his throat.''

Jurors in an Orlando courtroom followed along Monday, reading a transcript as they watched the black-and-white confession video on small monitors in front of each of their chairs in the jury box.

The case was moved to Orlando after too many prospective jurors in Miami said they already knew the story of Jaime's death just before homeroom on Feb. 3, 2004.

Several jurors shook their heads and grimaced as Hernandez told Garafalo how Jaime begged for his life after the initial slash across his neck, which wasn't fatal.

''He asked me not to kill him,'' Hernandez said. ``I told him OK, if he cooperates. That was a lie.''

During a break in the questioning while a court reporter in the interrogation room changed her transcription tape, Hernandez asked Garafalo how police had zeroed in on him as a suspect.

''The glove that you found, is that what caused me to come down here?'' Hernandez asked about a bloody latex glove he had taken off after stabbing Jaime.

Hernandez sat at the defense table watching the confession on a monitor, shaking his leg as he followed along with the transcript.

Hernandez, now 18, is charged with first-degree murder and faces life in prison. His legal team has mounted an insanity defense.

Jaime's parents, Jorge and Maria Gough, took deep breaths and held each other as they listened to Hernandez's matter-of-fact description of their son's gruesome death. They have heard the confession at least once before, during a hearing last year when the defense tried to have it tossed. Circuit Judge John Schlesinger ruled then that the jury could hear the confession.

Hernandez was taken out of class and questioned by police shortly after Jaime's body was found. They first talked with him in a school office, then took him to the department's homicide bureau.

Hernandez's parents have complained that he was taken from the school without their knowledge.

Police called Manny Hernandez later that afternoon. When the couple arrived at the police department, they say they were told that Hernandez was a witness to Jaime's death but not that he was a suspect.

They were allowed to meet with their son briefly but told not to ask him what happened. Without knowing he might be charged with murder, Manny Hernandez urged his son to cooperate with police and tell them the truth.

Now, he's angry that police questioned his son for hours.

''He should have had one or both of us there,'' Manny Hernandez said during an interview with The Miami Herald in April. ``A child is not in a position to waive their rights, a mentally ill child.''

Richard Rosenbaum, lead attorney for Hernandez, tried to get the confession thrown out, making that very argument. His effort failed.

Witness: I watched as homeless man was beaten to death

BY TODD WRIGHT

A key eyewitness testified Monday he watched in horror as his friend repeatedly swung a wooden baseball bat at the head of a homeless man, smashing the man's face in during a brutal unprovoked attack.

William Ammons, 21, told jurors he stood about 10 feet away on Jan. 12, 2006, and saw blood splatter as Thomas Daugherty took at least two full swings at the face of Norris Gaynor, who later died from severe skull fractures.

Daugherty, 19, and Brian Hooks, 21, are charged with first-degree murder and attempted murder for their roles in the beatings of three homeless men that night. If convicted, they could be sentenced to life in prison.

''I saw the blood and it freaked me out. I was surprised he hit him so hard,'' said Ammons, who was also charged in the crimes but took a plea deal just before the trial started. ``Tom was acting like nothing really happened.''

On Jan. 12, 2006, Ammons, Daugherty, Hooks and Joey Griffith made a ''mutual agreement to go mess with some homeless people,'' Ammons testified.

After each attack, the teens returned to Ammons' Fort Lauderdale home and smoked marijuana and consumed vodka before leaving the house again to select a new target, Ammons said.

Ammons participated in two of the attacks, using a paintball gun in the attack on Gaynor and a plastic sword to beat Raymond Perez.

He pleaded guilty to third-degree murder and is expected to be sentenced to between 10 and 20 years in prison. In return, he agreed to testify against Hooks and Daugherty.

Ammons is scheduled for sentencing Sept. 24.

Daugherty used a baseball bat in all three attacks and Hooks used a bat, rake and golf club, Ammons said.

Ammons said he was pressured into participating in the attacks after the first attack on Jacques Pierre at Florida Atlantic University's downtown Fort Lauderdale campus, which was caught by a surveillance camera.

''They wanted to go out and beat up another dude, but I really didn't want to go,'' Ammons said. ``They called me a party pooper.''

Defense attorneys are set to cross examine Ammons after a lunch break.

Catholic Bishops of Florida Urge Mercy for Richard Henyard


For Immediate Release
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Contacts:

Michele M. Taylor
Sheila S. Hopkins

Associate for Communications
Associate Director for Social Concerns/Respect Life

(850) 205-6817
(850) 205-6826

mtaylor@flacathconf.org
shopkins@flacathconf.org



Catholic Bishops of Florida Urge Mercy for Richard Henyard
Implore Governor Crist to End Executions

Tallahassee - Governor Crist, the bishops of Florida continue to plead for an end to the use of the death penalty in our state. The September 23 execution of Richard Henyard will be another example of our failure to recognize the inherent dignity of every human being, even those guilty of horrible crimes.

While the untimely deaths of the two young victims and serious injury to their mother cry out for justice, we are reminded that executions diminish us as a civil society and perpetuate a culture of death instead of a culture of life that acknowledges all are created in God’s image. The details of this crime, including the culpability of the accomplice and the young age of Mr. Henyard at the time of the crime, are enough reason to question the inconsistencies in sentencing in Florida, a point made by the Florida Death Penalty Assessment Team in 2006.

Life in prison without possibility of parole is severe punishment for offenders. While the Church acknowledges that society has a right to execute violent transgressors, the ability of the modern penal system to protect society makes the need for the death penalty very rare, if not practically nonexistent.

We pray for and grieve with Dorothy Lewis who lost her daughters, Jasmine and Jamilya, as the result of this crime. No one can truly comprehend the unimaginable loss of two young children.

Governor Crist, we ask you to spare the life of Richard Henyard. Killing another human being perpetuates violence in our society. We must respect all life, even those who have done great wrong.

Archbishop John C. Favalora Bishop Victor Galeone Bishop Robert N. Lynch
Archdiocese of Miami Diocese of St. Augustine Diocese of St. Petersburg

Bishop Thomas G. Wenski Bishop John H. Ricard, SSJ Bishop Gerald M. Barbarito
Diocese of Orlando Diocese of Pensacola-Tallahassee Diocese of Palm Beach

Bishop Frank J. Dewane Auxiliary Bishop Felipe J. Estevez Auxiliary Bishop John G. Noonan
Diocese of Venice Archdiocese of Miami Archdiocese of Miami



# # #


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Florida Catholic Conference is an agency of the Catholic Bishops of Florida.
It speaks for the Church in matters of public policy and serves as liaison to the executive, legislative and judicial branches
of government. The archbishop and bishops of the seven (arch)dioceses in Florida constitute its board of directors.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Mom: Teen is afraid of FHP trooper's 'sexual remarks and advances'


Amy L. Edwards

Sentinel Staff Writer

September 17, 2008

A temporary injunction has been filed against a Florida Highway Patrol trooper accused of having sexually explicit communications with the 17-year-old daughter of another FHP employee.

Cpl. James E. Gilbert, a 45-year-old traffic-homicide investigator, was placed on paid administrative leave Friday, FHP Capt. Mark Welch said.

In a written statement filed in Orange County Circuit Court, the teenager's mother said she recently overheard her daughter on the phone with Gilbert. The teen told her mother about Gilbert's infatuation with her, sexual text messages he sent and other conversations they had.

Gilbert told the teen he wanted to take her to cabins in Tennessee and take things "slow," the mother wrote. The mother said Gilbert met her daughter for lunch, grabbed her hand, and "told her that hands are sensual & sexy."

The mother wrote that Gilbert will not leave her daughter alone and the teen is afraid of him "due to his sexual remarks and advances."

"I think he will follow her and hurt her, since we have now found out," the woman wrote.

A temporary injunction for protection was granted Thursday, and a hearing to determine whether to make it final will be Monday.

Gilbert, who lives in Apopka, has been employed with FHP since 1991 and has no previous disciplinary action in his personnel file, Welch said. He is assigned to Troop K, which patrols Florida's Turnpike.

A voice message left Tuesday for Gilbert was not returned.




Amy L. Edwards can be reached at 407-420-5735 or aledwards@orlandosentinel.com.

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Ex-Hillsborough jail medical director charged with prescription fraud


By Justin George, Times Staff Writer

Published Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:48 PM


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TAMPA — The former medical director of the Hillsborough County jail system has been charged with prescription fraud in a joint state and local law enforcement investigation.

John Nkolo Mubang, 57, oversaw jail health care when Prison Health Services, a private company from Brentwood, Tenn., contracted with Hillsborough County earlier this decade, sheriff's spokeswoman Debbie Carter said.

Over the last few years, he has been practicing internal medicine privately at a Tampa clinic he owns and operates.

Complaints from Mubang's patients to the Sheriff's Office prompted a six-month investigation with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, which concluded that Mubang was providing prescription drugs to patients who didn't need them, FDLE officials said in a statement.

He was arrested Wednesday at his clinic and charged with three counts of prescribing controlled substances for monetary gain, a third-degree felony, and one count of trafficking in controlled substances, a first-degree felony. He was being held in a Hillsborough County jail without bail.

In 1996, the Association of Responsible Medicine, a nonprofit Tampa health care advocacy group, reviewed malpractice lawsuits filed in Hillsborough and Pinellas counties and found that Mubang was one of 18 doctors sued three or more times since 1992, the Tampa Bay Business Journal reported.

In July 2007, Mubang settled a malpractice claim with Nancy J. Thomas after she alleged she didn't get treatment during her pregnancy at a correctional facility on March 5, 2004, according to a closed claims report from the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation. Thomas' delivery was stillborn, the report said.

Carl Hyder, 21, was under Mubang's private care when he died July 8, 2006, said his mother, Tammy Hyder, 48, of Seffner.

When Hyder was 17, the young electrician underwent back surgery after being in a car accident.

"My son needed pain medication, and he found this Dr. Mubang, and next thing he walked out with the highest concentration of Xanax," Tammy Hyder said. "One (pill) would put him under the table."

Besides the anti-anxiety medication, Tammy Hyder said Mubang also prescribed Soma, a muscle relaxer for her son. She said the pills made him seem "like he drank a six pack."

On the night of his death, she said, she hugged her son before he went to bed. He never awoke, and Hyder said the prescribed drugs were among the factors listed in his cause of death.

Carl Hyder left behind 4-year-old Carl Jr. and 3-year-old Alexis.

Times researcher Shirl Kennedy contributed to this report. Justin George can be reached at (813) 226-3368 or jgeorge@sptimes.com.

Lover crumbles, leads police to body

Nine-year-old mystery: Rosemary Christensen from Melbourne vanished in Florida in 1999.


By Peta Hellard in Los Angeles
September 13, 2008 03:24am

AN American accused of the stabbing death of his Australian wife could face the electric chair for the 1999 murder after her body was found buried at a secluded Florida property this week.

Robert Glenn Temple, 58, faces life imprisonment or a death sentence if found guilty of murdering Rosemary Christensen, from Melbourne, who vanished in August 1999.

Mr Temple, being held in a California jail on unrelated charges, was informed two days ago that Florida authorities were planning to charge him with one count of first degree murder.

Mr Temple's girlfriend, Leslie Stewart, 31, led investigators to Ms Christensen's grave this week after confessing that she helped dispose of the body in bush at her father's property near the Suwannee River in Florida's rural Pinellas County.

Sheriff's investigators said Ms Christensen, 43, had been stuffed in a green, plastic storage bin wrapped with duct tape, with her body found clothed in a nightgown and doubled over in a fetal position. Ms Christensen, who was identified through dental records, was believed to have died from at least one stab wound to the abdomen.

The case has sparked outrage in Florida after authorities revealed Ms Stewart, who has a three-year-old daughter with Mr Temple, would not be prosecuted after making a deal to testify against him.

Prosecutors allege Mr Temple stabbed his wife at their home and then enlisted Ms Stewart - a co-worker with whom he was having an affair - to help him hide the body.

Ms Stewart's lawyer, Jay Hebert, said his client was a victim of domestic violence and Mr Temple had threatened to kill her and their daughter Alyssa if she ever revealed the murder.

Ms Christensen's sons from a previous marriage, Radinck and Olivier van Vollenhoven, who live in the Netherlands, said they could finally close a difficult chapter in their lives.

"Olivier and I are relieved that our mother, Rosemary, has been found after all these years and that we can finally get closure and move on with our lives," Radinck said.

Ms Christensen, who worked as a real estate agent in the Florida town of Belleair, was married to Mr Temple for two years.

Her mother reportedly lives in Ringwood and her father in Mornington.

Prosecutors said if Mr Temple were found guilty he faced life imprisonment or a death sentence -- and he would get to choose between lethal injection or the electric chair.

Mr Temple will not officially be charged until the matter goes before a grand jury in Florida on October 7.

The trial will not take place for at least 18 months.

Mr Temple initially told detectives he suspected Ms Christensen left him for another man.

He even launched public appeals through the media for anyone who knew of her location to contact him.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Respect life gathering to focus on Humanae Vitae at 40


Affordability is a key feature of this year’s annual statewide respect life conference.

JEAN GONZALEZ FLORIDA CATHOLIC STAFF

Published: 09.10.08

Cost of the conference ranges from $40 to $90 (with a combined rate for married couples and special rates for students).

For additional information, call 850-763-1821 or 850-215-5046 or download the conference brochure from the Florida Catholic Conference HERE. Registration deadline is Sept. 30.

A document that serves as the foundation for Catholic respect life programs and philosophies will be the focus of an annual statewide conference.

This year marks four decades since the release of Pope Paul VI’s encyclical Humanae Vitae, which translates to Of Human Life. Though the document was subtitled “on the regulation of birth” and most notably reaffirmed the church’s traditional teaching on the moral unacceptability of contraception, it addressed a spectrum of issues including married love and responsible parenting, and in large part inspired the broad respect life movement as it exists today.

That’s why organizers of this year’s gathering of people involved in those efforts all over Florida chose “Celebrating the 40th Anniversary of Humanae Vitae” for their theme.

The Pensacola-Tallahassee Diocese, along with the state Pro-Life Coordinating Committee and the Florida Catholic Conference, will host the 22nd annual Florida Respect Life Conference Oct. 10-11 at the Ramada Conference Center in Tallahassee.

Although in years past the conference has run through Sunday morning, Deacon Tim Warner, respect life director for the Pensacola-Tallahassee Diocese, said the committee hoped to make the conference more affordable for participants. By putting the events on a Friday night and full day Saturday, participants might avoid an extra stay in a hotel and the conference does not have to rent the facilities for another day.

Deacon Warner said each conference incorporates a certain personality of the host diocese. He said the Pensacola-Tallahassee Diocese’s personality is reflected in the participation of the Florida State University Catholic Student Union as ministers of music at the conference.

“I think the students, given their age and current status in life, will be particularly interested in the presentations regarding marriage, theology of the body and Natural Family Planning,” Deacon Warner said.

Several of the speakers are natives to the diocese, including Bishop Martin Holley, auxiliary bishop of Washington, D.C., who will open the conference with an address Friday night. Three doctors of the diocese will present a physicians’ panel discussion on Natural Family Planning. Deacon Warner said the discussion will not just be informative, but will include the faith experiences all the doctors faced in their vocations. While all three OB/GYNs had once worked with contraception and sterilization, all three physicians “awakened to the beauty of natural family planning in their own practices,” he said.

“In essence, their experiences with NFP were conversion moments for each one of them,” Deacon Warner said.

Another conversion experience will be shared on the topic of the death penalty. Ron McAndrew, a former warden at the Florida State Prison, will speak about his own personal conversion from someone who used to oversee executions to an advocate to end the use of the death penalty.

The event will include other addresses on various topics, including marriage, theology of the body and stem-cell research. Bishop Victor Galeone, of St. Augustine, will offer the closing address for the event on Saturday evening.

Family struggles with son's murder for 17 years


09/10/2008 01:19 PM
Kim Matas

Even the execution of the man who raped and murdered the young boy has not brought them closure.

By MIKE WILLIAMS
Cox News Service
August 31, 2008

COCOA, Fla. – For Vicki Rios-Martinez, peace has come slowly over the years, growing bit by bit as she began writing poetry, tending her garden, listening for her dead son’s voice when she meditated.

But complete closure to her family’s 17-year-ordeal may never come. It still eludes them, even following their attendance at the July 1 execution of Mark Dean Schwab, the man who raped and murdered their 11-year-old son, Junny.

“It has brought about a peace ././. just to know that we don’t have to go to another appeal ././. just to know that it’s over and that he’ll never get out and hurt another child,” she said. “But closure? Seventeen years is way too long to wait for justice. And something that you cannot forget, it’s real hard to close the door.”

For nearly two decades Rios-Martinez and her husband, Braulio, who goes by the nickname “Junny,” have occupied a prominent – and unwanted – role in the nation’s long-running debate over the death penalty.

Their son’s murder in 1991 became what is now a familiar cable-TV mega-event, complete with breathless reports and frenzied speculation.

Junny, a sandy-haired boy with a sunny disposition and a winning smile, became a target after his photograph appeared in the local newspaper. Schwab, just two weeks past an early release from prison for raping a 13-year-old boy, saw the photo and became fixated.

Posing as a journalist, he tried to weasel his way into Junny’s world, eventually pretending to be his father in a telephone call and arranging to pick up the boy at school. Schwab then kidnapped, raped and murdered Junny.

He was arrested within days and led police to the footlocker where he had stowed the boy’s body.

But losing their son and watching his killer arrested was only the start of the Rios-Martinez family’s ordeal.

The trial was over in about 15 months, with Schwab convicted and sentenced to death. But the appeals process lasted nearly 15 years, prolonging the family’s suffering, they said.

“With him (Schwab) being alive and still going through appeals, your life is always in a turmoil ././. it’s never a balance,” Vicki Rios-Martinez said. “It’s always going to have that roller coaster ride.”

Their journey was painful and hard, filled with understandable anger and bitterness that slowly gave way to acceptance, an attempt to move on emotionally and eventually the slow accrual of a sense of peace.

But nothing was easy, nothing a given. The family’s outspoken criticism of the glacial pace of the appeals process and their insistence that Schwab pay the ultimate price for his crime made them a target for some death penalty opponents who claim execution is cruel and inhumane.

Junny Rios-Martinez – the nickname he goes by and gave to his son came from his grandmother – went through a long period of anger that still flashes quickly to the surface.

He once routinely pummeled a boxing bag to vent his fury.

He finally channeled the anger into building an addition onto the rear of their neat home that fronts a small lake. There’s an upstairs music studio, pine-paneled walls covered with photos of their son and a wrap-around porch fronting the lake, complete with a big swinging hammock.

Vicki Rios-Martinez met the challenge of her son’s death with concerted attempts to make something positive out of the tragedy. Over the years, with her husband as partner, she battled for children’s rights and became an advocate against abuse and for the rights of the victims of crimes.

The experience left her frustrated with legislators and the criminal justice system, which she says is weighted far too much in favor of protecting criminals’ rights at the expense of victims’ rights.

“We definitely need to have a better system,” she said. “We definitely need to have a children’s bill of rights. We definitely need to have a victim’s justice system, and we need to start changing it now.”

Junny Martinez makes no apologies for the couple’s outspoken support of the death penalty. Schwab’s execution was delayed because of court challenges sparked by a botched 2006 execution in which a condemned man took more than 30 minutes to die by lethal injection.

“Those bleeding hearts, the majority of them have no children and couldn’t fathom what we’ve been through,” he said. “They haven’t a clue. And yet they all have an opinion. And they feel that their opinion is much more important.”

The couple insists Schwab’s death was humane and even “peaceful,” unlike what their son went through at his killer’s hands, they said.

Vicki Rios-Martinez opposed the death penalty before her family’s tragedy, out of a reverence for all life. She now supports it, she says, because she feels she must do so in order to protect other children from killers like Schwab.

The couple has worked hard to move on over the years, but it’s clear the wounds of their loss are still close beneath the surface.

In her garden, Vicki Rios-Martinez tends a dazzling array of flowers and shrubs, but one holds a special place in her heart. A potted peace lily is the only flower left from her son’s memorial service so many years ago.

“I killed everything else,” she said, laughing at her woeful early attempts at gardening, which she says miraculously ended when her dead son spoke to her. “Then one day Junny told me, ’Mom, you want a green thumb? You’ve got one.”’

State supreme court uphold execution


MILLARD K. IVES

Staff Writer

TALLAHASSEE -- The appeal to stop the Sept. 23 execution of a man convicted of killing two Eustis girls was rejected Wednesday by the Florida Supreme Court.

Justices voted 6-0 to uphold the execution of 34-year-old death row inmate Richard Henyard, despite his argument that he was not the triggerman.

In its 24-page opinion, the justices stated that "... even if we accept Henyard's allegations as true, we find that the record affirmatively refutes Henyard's claim of reduced culpability..."

Henyard is scheduled to be executed by lethal injection.

Henyard had appealed to the Florida Supreme Court on Monday in the last-ditch effort. His lawyer contended Henyard should get a hearing to present evidence that it was his accomplice, Alphonsa Smalls, who pulled the trigger.

Mark Gruber, Henyard's attorney, argued that prosecutors withheld information from the defense about a sworn statement from Smalls' jail pod mate, Jason Nawara -- statements that Smalls boasted about being the "killa."

In their opinion, the justices stated that "At trial, the state did not rely on Henyard being the triggerman, but rather relied on his dominant role in the entire criminal episode and unrefuted evidence of his close proximity to the child victims at the time of their deaths."

The high court backed Lake Circuit Judge Mark Hill's decision last month to reject Henyard's claims without an evidentiary hearing.

The ruling also says, "The record affirmatively supports the state's position that regardless of whether Smalls or Henyard pulled the trigger, Henyard's substantial culpability as outlined by the trial court in great detail and as reflected in our opinion affirming his death sentence establishes the death penalty as a proportionate sentence for his actions."

According to his printed ruling, Hill found several problems with granting a new hearing. This includes the fact that even if Nawara's testimony were to be admissible, the court would have to find that Henyard's participation was "relatively minor."

"In no reasonable interpretation of the phrase could Mr. Henyard ever be considered a 'relatively minor participant' in these capital felonies," Hill stated in his ruling.

Henyard and Smalls were convicted of abducting sisters Jasmine Lewis, 3, and Jamilya Lewis, 7, and their mother from a Eustis grocery store in 1993.

They raped the mother on the trunk of her car as the girls sat in the back seat. They then shot the mother four times, including once in the head and left her for dead, but she survived.

The boys then shot and killed the girls in a separate location.

Smalls, was 14 at the time of the shooting, leaving him ineligible for the death penalty. He is serving life without parole.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

FLORIDA - KILLING MENTALLY ILL IS NO SOLUTION


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - SEPTEMBER 10, 2008

FLORIDA - KILLING MENTALLY ILL IS NO SOLUTION

The death penalty has one so called social purpose and that is to deter prospective offenders from commiting any future crimes. Though this is questionable in itself, and debatable in more ways than one, what is more frightening is when we impose a death sentence on an individual who is mentally ill and who has diminished capacities to understand and process information; an individual who is unable to communicate, to abstract from mistakes and learn from experience, to engage in logical reasoning, to control impulses, and to understand the reactions of others.


Richard Henyard, whose execution date has been set for September 23, 2008 falls into this category. Recent research concerning emotional development points to the fact that Mr Henyard's mental and emotional deficits have produced a disability within him which is identical to mental retardation in its disabling features. This was not been taken into account by the court when imposing a death sentence on this man. At the time of the murder of both Jamilya, 7, and Jasmine, 3, Lewis, and the rape of their mother, Dorothy Lewis, evidence points to the fact that Henyard was sufferring from a neurological impairment which rendered his social and cognitive skills impaired. Yet the trial court chose to put little weight on these mitigating circumstances, downplaying the fact that at the time of the murder, the defendant was functioning at the emotional level of a thirteen year old and was of low intelligence; ignoring that the defendant had an impoverished upbringing. Limited importance on the fact that the defendant was born into a dysfunctional family.


Mr. Henyard was abandoned by his mother from the age of two months. Although she was physically present at times, she did not bond with Mr. Henyard or demonstrate any emotional connection with her child. Mr. Henyard’s impaired caregiving at infancy produced avoidant/disorganized attachment, which compromised his emotional maturity. He suffered from attachment disorganization and was subject to severe and chronic trauma.


Research indicates that emotional development and the ability to make emotional and social judgments is a skill that begins developing very early, as an infant, and is shaped by both neuropsychological (brain-based) factors such as nonverbal abilities, as well as early emotional environmental influence such as a maternal bond. Mr. Henyard's inability to adapt lies at the core of his capacity to function and to embrace the moral accountabily which is necessary to face the reasons which have brought his actions to warrant the death penalty.


The Defendant’s mental condition at the time of the offense bars the adoption of the death penalty under the rationale of Atkins, 536 U.S. 304 and Roper v. Simmons, 543. In effect the execution of a mentally ill inmate is deemed unconstitutional. The Eighth Amendment prohibits "excessive" sanctions on people suffering from mental illness to the same degree as mr. Henyard, who have diminished capacities and personal culpablity. Why then is this man facing imminent execution?


At the time this crime was commited Henyard, who was just 18, was associating with Alfonza Smalls, his codefendant in this case, barely 14 years old. Tipically, Henyard's pattern seemed to be to seek out younger children as companions due to his lower IQ and "mental" age of 13/14 in order to avoid harassment from children his own age. He was functioning within a background which offered him no support, one in which he chose to be a follower rather than a leader. He displayed a very withdrawn character while growing up, and other than a neglectful mother who rarely accepted her responsibilities and who exposed him to her own petty theivery, there was no significant role model in this boy's life to give him guidance. His overwhelming need to be accepted by others, his emotional abandonment are critical factors in the way this man's life evolved and how it shaped his actions. Records indeed indicate a long pattern of biological-based learning problems in early childhood, traumatic neglect, and

emotional impoverishment which combined, impacted his character in a way which caused him to function at a substantially subnormal level. At the time of the crime, Mr. Henyard was acting with the mind of a 13 year old. How is it possible to justify the death sentence with such an individual? One must seriously question whether a man with this sort of disability is fully able to assess potential outcomes from different courses of action that present themselves to him.


In 2008 Jason Nawara who was housed in the same jail as Henyard's codefendant, sumitted an affadevit in which he testified that Smalls boasted more than once to having himself commited the killings, never implicating Henyard. Such testimony submitted during the penalty phase of the trial would in itself establish statutory mitigation that Mr. Smalls is more culpable than Mr. Henyard and/or that Mr. Henyard’s involvement was relatively minor in comparison to Mr. Smalls. This evidence could establish mitigation and confirm that Mr. Henyard was infact not the actual person who shot Jasmine and Jamilya. This alone merits consideration by the court. It again places doubt on how guilty Mr. Henyard truly is.


While Henyard's deficiencies do not warrant his exemption from criminal sanctions, Florida Support believes that killing this individual is not the solution. What needs to be emphasized is how important it is to take into account the whole framework of Richard`s upbringing, at both a social and psychological level together with the factors which lead this then child to participate in actions which required a level of moral understanding and social responsability well out of his reach. We are now equipped with more options to help individuals like this to coup and function. Killing Richard Henyard is not an option. He can be provided with the tools to live a fruitful life , one in which he can contribute positively to this society, and be of support to other victims. He can be equipped with a new found social consciouns and encouraged by the support of qualified people, step beyond the traumas of his past. With God's forgiveness, we can save a neglected life and help a lost soul to find his way back into the fold.


Today, Richard has a good rapport with Florida Support . He should be given the chance he has never had and recognition that he can function effectively if allowed to understand and deal with his own limitations. What purpose would there be in destroying another life when there is so much to show that Henyard was acting with deminished responsability at that time? Can we even really be sure that he ever committed the crimes he is accused of? There is doubt there too as to the part he played that night. With support and with guidance, the ghosts of his misgiven youth can be chased away. The imposition of the death penalty on a measurably severe mentally ill person, is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering. We cannot allow that to happen.

For information

FLORIDA SUPPORT

info@floridasupport.us

Dianne Abshire - afua@woh.rr.com

Giuseppina Branca - giusi@floridasupport.us

Carie Mendyk - m.cirene@gmail.com

Serena Hill - serena@floridasupport.us

Sissel Egeland - sissel@floridasupport.us

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

New evidences in Richard Henyard

B. The Evidence That Entitles Mr. Henyard to Relief
In his August 4, 2008 motion for relief, Mr. Henyard submitted an affidavit
executed by Jason Nawara on July 24, 2008. PC-R Vol. II at 304-05. Mr. Nawara,
who is serving a sentence at Jefferson Correctional Institution, remains available to
testify to the substance of his statements, which provide that: In 1993, Mr. Nawara,
who was then fourteen years old, was arrested for first degree murder. While


awaiting trial, he was housed in the Lake County Jail with Mr. Henyard’s co-
defendant, Alfonza Smalls, who was also fourteen years old and awaiting trial for
his role in the case at hand. Mr. Nawara states in the affidavit that during the
fourteen months that they lived together in the same quad, he heard Mr. Smalls
state in a group setting on several occasions, “I’m a killa, you just a car thief” and
“I’ve killed before and I’ll kill again.” According to Mr. Nawara, he could tell that
Mr. Smalls was “dead serious” when he made these statements. Furthermore, Mr.
Nawara states that Mr. Smalls never denied killing the victims in the instant case,
nor did he say or insinuate that Mr. Henyard killed the victims.
The trial court summarily denied relief in an order dated August 14, 2008.
PC-R Vol. III at 535-53. Although the trial court did not directly address the first
prong of Jones, it found that, “Assuming that the defense has met its burden of
showing the evidence was unknown at the time of trial and could not have been
known with the use of due diligence under the first prong of Jones, Mr. Henyard
has not demonstrated that he could succeed on the second prong.” PC-R Vol. III at
541. Because the trial court did not grant Mr. Henyard an evidentiary hearing on
this claim, the Court must accept all allegations in the motion as true, including
Mr. Nawara’s affidavit, to the extent that they are not refuted by the record. See
Hodges, 885 So. 2d at 335.


The court further erroneously found in its order that the statements made by
Mr. Smalls to Mr. Nawara are hearsay statements that would be inadmissible at a
penalty phase trial. PC-R Vol. III at 542. Fla. R. Crim. P. 921.141(1) states that in
a penalty phase trial:
[E]vidence may be presented as to any matter that the
court deems relevant to the nature of the crime and the
character of the defendant and shall include matters
related to any of the aggravating or mitigating
circumstances enumerated in subsections (5) and (6).
Any such evidence which the court deems to have
probative value may be received, regardless of its
admissibility under the exclusionary rules of evidence,
provided the defendant is accorded a fair opportunity to
rebut any hearsay statements (emphasis added).

Even if Mr. Nawara’s testimony regarding Mr. Smalls’ statements does not fall
under any hearsay exception, his statements would be admissible at a penalty phase
trial. Moreover, the Rules of Evidence 90.804 (1) and (2)(c) defines the
parameters for the introduction of statements by witnesses who themselves are
unavailable to testify. In this case, the defense could have called Alfonzo Smalls
who would have pled his 5th Amendment protection against self-incrimination. At
this time, the Court would have declared Mr. Smalls unavailable as a witness
which would have allowed the defense to call Jason Nawara to introduce the
statement of Mr. Smalls. See Perry v. State, 675 So.2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996);

Brinson v. State, 382 So.2d 322 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1979).

Additionally, the testimony of Mr. Nawara that Mr. Smalls stated on numerous
occasions that he was a killer would establish statutory mitigation that Mr. Smalls
is more culpable than Mr. Henyard and/or that Mr. Henyard’s involvement was
relatively minor in comparison to Mr. Smalls. Even if Mr. Smalls is not found to
be the more culpable party, the evidence could have been presented as nonstatutory
mitigation to establish that Mr. Henyard was not the actual person who shot
Jasmine and Jamilya.

Applying Jones to the case at hand, Mr. Nawara’s testimony meets the first
prong of the test for newly discovered evidence because it was not known to the
trial court or defendant’s counsel and it could not have been known by the
defendant or counsel by the use of due diligence. Mr. Henyard’s counsel was not
aware that Mr. Nawara might have information concerning Mr. Henyard’s case
until recently, when CCRC found Mr. Nawara’s name in a transcript of a jailhouse
interrogation of a juvenile by the name of Jimmy Kennedy. PC-R Vol. III at 495.
Assistant State Attorney William Gross conducted the interrogation on March 22,
1995. PC-R Vol. III at 531. In fact, the transcript further reveals that the State
questioned Mr. Kennedy regarding Mr. Henyard’s and Mr. Smalls’ pending
criminal case. PC-R Vol. III at 531. By the State’s own admission, the transcript

is “real hard to read.” PC-R Vol. III at 531. Reading Mr. Nawara’s name on the
transcript proved even more difficult, as it appears that at one time a highlighter
was used on the document, which had the effect of blocking out a lot of the names
on the copy. PC-R Vol. III at 495. The transcript in question was not provided in
discovery to Mr. Henyard’s trial counsel, and the State did not reveal Mr.
Kennedy’s name in its discovery response. Therefore, this evidence satisfies the
first prong of Jones.

The trial court also erred in its finding that the second prong of Jones is not
met because “[i]n no reasonable interpretation of the phrase could Mr. Henyard
ever be considered a ‘relatively minor participant’ in these capital felonies.” PC-R
Vol. III at 541. Although Mr. Henyard confessed to raping and shooting Ms.
Lewis and being present when Jasmine and Jamilya were shot, he continuously
denied that he shot the girls, Henyard v. State, 689 So.2d 239 (Fla. 1997), unlike
Mr. Smalls, who, while his case was still pending, bragged that he killed before
and he would kill again. Likewise, defense counsel argued at trial that although
Mr. Henyard was involved in the crime, it was Mr. Smalls and not Mr. Henyard
who shot Jasmine and Jamilya. ROA at 1106-07. Mr. Nawara’s testimony
supports Mr. Henyard’s statement and defense counsel’s argument at trial that Mr.
Henyard did not shoot the girls.

A statutory mitigating circumstance under Fla. Stat. 921.141(d) is that “[t]he
defendant was an accomplice in the capital felony committed by another person
and his or her participation was relatively minor.” The fact that it was Mr. Smalls
and not Mr. Henyard who shot Jasmine and Jamilya mitigates Mr. Henyard’s
culpability and establishes an additional statutory mitigating factor under Fla. Stat.
921.141(d), which was not established at trial. Additionally, Mr. Smalls was the
one who accosted Mrs. Lewis and her children at the Winn Dixie as they were
leaving. Mr. Smalls called for Mr. Henyard to come to the car and drive. And it
was Mr. Smalls who bragged to others in the detention center that he was a
“killer.” Mr. Smalls who is the more culpable in the murders of Jasmine and
Jimilya received a life sentence because of his age; however, Mr. Henyard received
a death sentence because at the time of the offense he was six months over the age
requirement for being a juvenile. However, the mitigation at trial established
Henyard’s emotional maturity between ten and thirteen years of age, which this
court specifically found to be age thirteen, which is vastly different than his
eighteen years of age at the time of the crime. When one weighs this evidence
which would have established a valid mitigator, and the mitigators established at
trial against the aggravating circumstances, the jury which was clearly at odds
when they changed their vote three times (ROA at 2557), likely would have

recommended a life sentence for Mr. Henyard.

Monday, September 8, 2008

Florida Death Row Appeal


The Florida Supreme Court is considering a last-ditch appeal from a convicted child killer who told a woman he was Satan after raping her and killing her two young daughters in 1993.

Richard Henyard is scheduled to die by lethal injection September 23rd. He was 18 years old when he committed the crimes in Lake County.

Monday his attorney argued before the Supreme Court that Henyard should get a formal hearing based on new evidence from a prison inmate.

The prisoner claims the other defendant in the murder case, Alfonza Smalls, took responsibility for the shootings. Smalls was only 14 years old at the time and received a life sentence because of his age.

A trial judge previously denied the request for a new hearing. The Supreme Court justices did not immediately rule on that request.

Gruber also argues the courts should take a closer look at Florida’s lethal injection process. Florida corrections officials changed the state’s death chamber protocols following the botched execution of Angel Diaz in 2006.

Henyard abducted Dorothy Lewis and her three-year-old and seven year-old daughters from a Eustis grocery store 15 years ago. Henyard and Smalls raped Lewis and then Henyard shot her several times and left her for dead, but she somehow survived. When her two daughters, Jasmine and Jamilya, kept crying and calling “Mommy,” Henyard shot both and dumped their bodies into underbrush along the road.

When Lewis prayed to Jesus for help, Henyard said, quote, “This ain’t Jesus, this is Satan,” according to court records.

Lewis is now a teacher and pastor in central Florida. She has declined to talk about the death warrant signed for Henyard.

Sunday, September 7, 2008

Polk jail deputy sold drugs to undercover cops, police say


Natalie Morera

Sentinel Staff Writer

September 7, 2008

The long arm of the law didn't have to reach far in Polk County, authorities said Friday.

A county detention deputy was arrested on charges of selling prescription pain pills to undercover sheriff's detectives.

The deputy, Shawn Thomas Lucas, 30, resigned. He is accused of selling pills with a street value of $200, to detectives Thursday night in Auburndale, authorities said.

Deputies said the charge against Lucas was upgraded to armed drug trafficking because a loaded .45-caliber handgun was found in his pickup.

Lucas worked at the South County Jail for more than two years

Volusia poised to swap care for jail's mentally ill


Rachael Jackson

Sentinel Staff Writer

September 5, 2008

After pressure from mental-health activists alleging inhumane care at the county jail, the Volusia County Council is considering hiring a local medical provider.

Prison Health Services has been criticized, particularly for denying medications to mental-health patients, since it was hired in 2005. On Thursday, council members said they want to partner with ACT Corp., a Volusia County group, for mental-health care and continue to use Prison Health Services for other medical needs.

The council will make a final decision at its Sept. 18 meeting. A yearlong contract for all services with PHS would have been about $7.5 million, but officials could not say what the price difference would be with the change.

The decision was met with relief from about 30 members of Fighting Against Injustice and Toward Harmony, a Volusia County group.

"As members of FAITH, we are here as a voice for those who do not have a voice," group co-chairman Jimmie Moore told the council. "We want to thank you many times over for addressing this issue and addressing it most appropriately."

Janet Miller, president of ACT, said many inmates were already under ACT's care. By providing on-site services, she said, her group could give more continuity. "We know our clients," she said.

Carla P. Cesario, a PHS division vice president, said the company would be happy to partner with ACT.

The Tennessee company treats a daily population of 1,500 at the Volusia County Branch Jail. It has faced several lawsuits in the county and throughout the country.

A local suit pending in federal court alleges that a Parkinson's patient died from ulcers and a staph infection because he was so poorly cared for.

The most recent Volusia suit, filed this summer, claims an inmate with brain damage and other disorders got much worse when she was denied medications.

David Hager, the former psychiatrist at the jail, left about three months ago.

Hager had a policy of taking mental-health patients off their medication to help him diagnose them, a spokeswoman said.

A new jail psychiatrist keeps them on their medication.

Since the change, Public Defender James S. Purdy said, he hasn't heard any complaints from inmates.

Miller said ACT will keep patients on their medication if it starts working in the jail.

"It's like a diabetic without insulin," she said.




Rachael Jackson can be reached at rjackson@orlandosentinel.com or 386-851-7923.

Judge tells killer to let justice take its course


Rene Stutzman

Sentinel Staff Writer

September 5, 2008

SANFORD

A judge on Thursday talked murderer Andrew Allred out of firing his attorney.

Allred, 22, of Oviedo cyberstalked his estranged girlfriend, then got a gun and on Sept. 24, 2007, went after her. He forced his way into an Oviedo house and shot and killed Tiffany Barwick, 19, and her friend Michael Ruschak, 22, a University of Central Florida student who lived there. He wounded a third person.

Allred pleaded guilty in April to two counts of first-degree murder and other charges from that night. Since then, he has complained repeatedly that his case has not moved through the court system fast enough.

He still faces the penalty phase of his trial, when a decision will be made on whether he should be executed or sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Allred did not say Thursday that he wants to die, but in a letter to the Orlando Sentinel in July, he wrote: "I've been pro-death penalty for as long as I can remember, why should my opinion change now that I'm facing the death penalty?"

He also wrote that Florida's execution method -- lethal injection -- is too gentle.

"Lethal injection doesn't scare anyone," he wrote. "We should bring back guns and rope and have public executions. . . . If I were given the option, I would want to be executed via guillotine."

Allred entered the guilty pleas against the advice of his attorney, Assistant Public Defender Tim Caudill.

He also in May requested and was granted the right to not be present for the penalty phase.

It was not clear Thursday whether that was still his intent.

Thursday's hearing lasted 10 minutes, and Allred said little. He looked far different, though, than the pudgy-faced 21-year-old who was arrested a year ago. He now is thin and wears a bushy, unkempt beard.

Circuit Judge O.H. Eaton Jr. told Allred that he understands the defendant's frustration but insisted that he has an obligation to hear evidence that might result in a life sentence.

Dismissing his attorneys, the judge told Allred, "is not going to speed up this case. It's going to slow it down."

Even if Allred served as his own attorney and offered no evidence at the penalty phase, Eaton said, he would appoint a special attorney, answerable to the judge, to investigate and present evidence on Allred's background and mental health.

One psychologist has evaluated Allred. Word of her findings was not available. He is still to be evaluated by a second, one hired by the state, Caudill said.

Eaton set the penalty phase of the trial for Sept. 22.

Allred agreed to stick with his attorneys "if we can get it done soon."


Rene Stutzman can be reached at rstutzman@orlandosentinel.com or 407-650-6394.

Updated: Sheriff's Office releases name of dead inmate


By TaMaryn Waters
Democrat Staff Writer

Calvin Torres, 27, died today in the Leon County Jail after having a medical emergency and losing consciousness when he was being escorted to the medical unit for court-ordered DNA testing.

According to the sheriff's office, Torres lost consciousness at about 1:30 p.m. Medical staff at the jail performed CPR and used a defibrillator on him.

He was pronounced dead at 2:10 p.m. at Tallahassee Memorial Hospital.

Torres had been an inmate at the jail since Oct. 25, 2007, where he was serving time on charges of possession of cocaine 1,000 feet of a church, possession of cannabis and possession of drug paraphernalia.

The cause of death is under investigation, according to reports. An autopsy will be conducted tomorrow morning. At this time, the report said the "initial indications appear Torres died of natural causes."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trial begins on gassing mentally ill inmates


By Paul Pinkham,
The Times-Union


A Jacksonville judge begins hearing evidence today about the use of pepper spray, tear gas and other chemical agents on mentally ill inmates by guards at Florida State Prison.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Corrigan is being asked to decide whether the practice is constitutional.

Lawyers for the inmates plan to argue that gassing confined mentally ill inmates for behavior caused by their illness is cruel and unusual punishment. They are asking Corrigan to halt the practice and require the state Department of Corrections to videotape gassing incidents and provide soap to gassed inmates.

Prison system lawyers maintain the practice is appropriate in some circumstances and that each gassing incident is unique. They've asked Corrigan to give the department latitude in maintaining order in one of Florida's toughest prisons.

Corrigan said he expects the non-jury trial to take a week and that he would rule as soon as possible after that. Constitutionality is the only issue he has to decide; individual claims by the inmates were settled previously.

The lawsuit was filed in 2004 on behalf of seven inmates at the Starke prison, only one of whom remains incarcerated there. The case was delayed by appeals and the unrelated criminal convictions of several high-ranking prison officials, including former department Secretary James Crosby, for taking kickbacks.

Attorney Buddy Schulz, representing the inmates, said gassing incidents rose dramatically after the beating death of Death Row inmate Frank Valdes by prison guards in 1999 when Crosby was the prison's warden. Gassing increased 50 percent the year after Valdes died, records show.

But Corrigan said he's less concerned about past abuses than current policies.

"I don't think my opinion would start with the checkered history of the Department of Corrections," the judge said during a pretrial hearing last week. "I would think it would start with this policy and whether it was constitutional or not."

Among the witnesses Schulz plans to call on the inmates' behalf is Elio Madan, former chief health officer at the prison. Department of Corrections attorney William Martin argued that Madan shouldn't be permitted to testify because he held an administrative position and spoke with prison lawyers specifically about the gassing lawsuit before leaving that post a year ago.

Corrigan allowed Martin to depose Madan.

Schulz also has listed several prisoners as witnesses, but said last week he probably won't call them depending on how the evidence goes.

"We just want the option," he said.

Corrigan said most of the evidence will be from medical, legal and corrections experts.

paul.pinkham@jacksonville.com, (904) 359-4107

Treasure Coast death row inmates continue appeals


By Staff report

Thursday, September 4, 2008

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — Three Treasure Coast convicted murderers on Florida’s death row are continuing to appeal Florida’s use of lethal injection, despite a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowing it, court officials say.

In July, Florida resumed lethal injection for capital punishment, which had been under a moratorium because of a botched injection in 2006, said Assistant State Attorney Ryan Butler.

Before the Supreme Court ruling, attorneys for death row inmates James Eric Chandler of Sebastian, William Reeves of Vero Beach and Billy Kearse of Fort Pierce, all asked for court hearings to challenge the procedure.

Now those requests are coming before local judges. On Wednesday, Indian River Circuit Judge Robert Peg postponed making a ruling after hearing from Chandler’s attorney, Martin McClain, with the state’s Capital Collateral Regional Counsel. The counsel handles post-conviction cases.

McClain argued that not granting a hearing would be a denial of due process. Assistant Attorney General Celia Terenzio disagreed, saying the issue of lethal injection has been settled.

In coming weeks, other Capital Collateral Regional Counsel attorneys will be in court calling for hearings on the potential use of lethal injection for Reeves and Kearse.

Chandler was convicted of beating two Sebastian retirees to death with a baseball bat in 1981. Reeves shot a sheriff’s deputy in 1987 outside a convenience store on State Road 60 west of Vero Beach.

In 1991, Kearse shot a Fort Pierce police officer 13 times following a traffic stop for going the wrong way on a one-way street.

Shackling of mentally ill foster kids in Dade, Broward courts in question


BY CAROL MARBIN MILLER cmarbin@MiamiHerald.com

Last month, a 16-year-old Broward County girl was brought into Circuit Judge John A. Frusciante's courtroom for a hearing. She was handcuffed, her legs shackled with cloth restraints, with two armed deputies leading her by the arm.

Her offense? She's never been charged with one. A mentally ill foster child who was neglected by her mother and wound up in a psychiatric center, the teen was being restrained to keep her from running away, her attorney said.

The girl, who is not being identified to protect her privacy, is among roughly 2,200 foster children in psychiatric centers in Florida recovering from abuse and neglect.

Now, the practice of restraining mentally ill foster children in court is prompting questions in both Broward and Miami-Dade counties.

In Fort Lauderdale, Walter Honaman, the 16-year-old's lawyer and an advocate for foster kids, is working with Frusciante and court officials to develop a voluntary policy to discourage deputies from handcuffing mentally ill foster kids who come to court.

And in Miami, a nurse practitioner who worked briefly as a director of patient care at Jackson Memorial Hospital's mental health center filed complaints with state regulators seeking to end the practice of restraining children who leave the hospital's residential treatment center.

''We bring these kids into the courtroom in handcuffs with armed deputies,'' said Honaman, who works for Legal Aid Service of Broward County. 'We don't maintain these kids' dignity, and we send the message that they are being punished. They are being treated like criminals. These are kids that need serious help.''

Real leg shackles -- the metal kind -- routinely have been used for delinquent children who appear in court, though several public defender offices mounted a statewide campaign two years ago to end the practice. In most counties, shackling continues, said Miami-Dade Public Defender-Elect Carlos Martinez, but The Florida Bar is lobbying for a new rule requiring hearings before restraints can be used.

STATE PRECEDENTS

Other states have questioned the practice of indiscriminately restraining children in court.

More than a decade ago, appeals courts in Oregon and Illinois ruled that children have a right to be free of shackles in court, lacking a specific danger.

Last year, the North Dakota Supreme Court ruled that a trial judge erred by not independently verifying a child, identified as R.W.S., was a danger when the judge refused to remove the boy's handcuffs in court, records show.

Also last year, two California appeals courts struck down the practice of shackling all youths who appear in court. And the North Carolina legislature recently passed a law requiring a hearing before restraints can be used.

Administrators at Jackson have defended the use of ''walking restraints'' when children from their treatment center leave the facility, arguing many kids run away, which can endanger them.

LESS THAN 1 PERCENT

The treatment center ''uses walking restraints for safety and prevention of elopement when clients are sent to an urgent medical appointment or court hearings that they can't miss early in their admission,'' Helga Mayrgundter, a program director for one of Jackson's children's psychiatric units, wrote in an April e-mail.

Lorraine N. Nelson, a Jackson spokeswoman, said the children's psychiatric unit uses walking restraints on less than 1 percent of its patients when they are being transported outside the facility and follows all regulatory agency guidelines.

''The fabric restraints are only used when a patient is determined to be a flight risk and are removed immediately after a patient has returned safely to the facility,'' Nelson said. ``A board-certified psychiatrist with extensive experience in childhood trauma and behavioral management must write an order for the use of restraints.''

Jackson's use of foot restraints came under scrutiny beginning in April, when a new nurse administrator questioned the practice. The nurse, Lisa Burton, later filed complaints, including one to the Miami-Dade County Commission on Ethics and Public Trust.

The ethics commission ''conducted a thorough investigation of the allegations and ultimately dismissed the complaint,'' said Nelson. The commission findings, ''speak for themselves,'' she said.

In an April e-mail with other hospital administrators, risk manager Tish Batchelder wondered whether halting the restraints would lead to more escapes and put patients in danger. But she also acknowledged: ``I hate the idea that we do it.''

`VERY DISTURBING'

Some judges say there is even less justification for restraining mentally ill foster kids who have not been accused of delinquency.

''It's a horrible stigma,'' said Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Cindy Lederman, who heads Miami's juvenile courts. ``These kids already have mental health problems. I would imagine this would exacerbate them . . . . These are not bad children, and they have not done anything wrong. They are just ill.''

Frusciante said he has been asking questions of treatment center and courthouse staff members who bring children to court in restraints.

Among them: Do we have to do this?

''It was very disturbing,'' said Frusciante, who oversees child welfare cases in Broward. He said he wasn't disturbed enough to outright ban the practice at the courthouse, but he is working with Honaman to find ways to limit the use of restraints.

Most treatment centers elsewhere in the state have abandoned the use of restraints, according to internal hospital e-mails obtained by The Miami Herald.

''We do not use them here when we transport children,'' said Robyn Baskin, a children's program director at Personal Enrichment Through Mental Health Services in Pinellas County.

If a child is too great a risk, Baskin said, travel will be postponed or additional staff is provided to ensure safety.

Friday, September 5, 2008

DOCTORS & EXECUTIONS: A complex dilemma of medicine, ethics and law


DOCTORS & EXECUTIONS: A complex dilemma of medicine, ethics and law

Deborah Denno in Gainesville Sun, January 28, 2007

Media Source: http://www.gainesville.com/apps/pbcs.dll/frontpage



The hood is off doctors involved in Florida executions, creating a conflict for a state trying to ensure that lethal injection is medically sound.

The Florida Department of Corrections has fought to conceal the identity of doctors who pronounce inmates dead at executions, saying it's against Florida law to reveal these doctors' names. In the death chamber, these physicians wear hoods and goggles, shielding their faces from execution witnesses.

But now the Alachua County medical examiner has released autopsy reports from 18 executions revealing the names of three doctors � Elio Madan, Rodrigo Quintana and Victor Selyutin � who have pronounced executed inmates dead. Unlike the Department of Corrections, the medical examiner contends that state law only protects the identity of the executioner, not these doctors.

The issue of doctor involvement in executions presents a "Catch-22" for Florida and other states trying to fix problems with lethal injection.

While states are working to ensure the lethal injection procedure is medically sound � a statewide commission begins its work Monday in Tampa, examining problems with Florida's execution process � the American Medical Association and other medical groups are telling doctors to shun involvement in executions.

Just last week in North Carolina, a judge halted two executions because of conflicts over doctors participating.

AMA guidelines restrict doctors from any role in execution, even pronouncing death. Helping carry out the death penalty violates a doctor's essential mission to preserve life, said Dr. William G. Plested III, AMA president.

"One of the first things we learn is 'do no harm,' and we really try to live up to that," he said.

In Florida and most other states, doctors face no legal penalties for violating the policy. But doctors may face scorn from their colleagues and might lose patients' trust if their involvement in executions is known, said Dr. William Allen, director of the bioethics, law and medical professionalism program at the University of Florida College of Medicine.

"Most physicians aren't eager to have that public association, even if they might be willing to do it," he said.

Doctors also face the prospect of protests from death penalty opponents. In addition to the doctors involved being named in autopsy reports, an Internet blog earlier this month posted the names of Madan, Selyutin and a physician's assistant involved in executions.

Sissel Egeland, a Norwegian resident who is a member of a prisoner support group called Florida Support, said she named the doctors in a post she made on a lethal injection blog in hopes that it would open these doctors to public scrutiny.

"I'm not after the doctors themselves, but I want them to withdraw from this dirty work," she said.

The issue has particular relevance in Florida following the botched execution of Angel Diaz on Dec. 13. Diaz was sentenced to death for the 1979 murder of a Miami topless club manager.

An improperly inserted IV caused Diaz to suffer footlong chemical burns on his arms and he appeared to writhe in pain before dying. The state subsequently halted executions and created the commission to study the lethal injection procedure and recommend changes.

Now the state faces the prospect of revamping the procedure at the same time that the role of medical professionals in executions faces new scrutiny.

In other states, such scrutiny has led to revelations about the qualifications of those involved in executions and led the courts to halt the death penalty.

"When you're allowed access to information, a lot of things surface that you don't know are there," said Linda McDermott, an attorney who represents Death Row inmates in Florida.

Records ID doctors

Since Florida instituted lethal injection in 2000, the state has executed 20 inmates using the method. The medical examiner has completed autopsies in 18 of those executions, with the remaining two still pending.

Reports on these autopsies indicate Selyutin has pronounced inmates dead in all but three of the 18 executions. His involvement in executions has been previously known.

After Florida's electric chair caused flames to shoot from two inmates' heads and a third inmate to bleed, in the 1990s, Selyutin was called to testify in a case challenging the procedure.

The challenge led the state to abandon the electric chair and switch to lethal injection.

These autopsy reports indicate Madan pronounced death in two executions and Quintana pronounced death in one execution.

An affidavit in the case of executed prisoner Arthur Rutherford revealed physician's assistant William F. Mathews has also been present at executions, but gives no indication about his role. But Mathews' statement also said he helped develop the state's lethal injection procedures in late 1999 and 2000.

Florida Department of Health records show both Selyutin and Mathews primarily practice medicine at Florida State Prison. They declined comment on their involvement in executions through corrections officials.

Records show Quintana has staff privileges at Columbia Correctional Institution in Lake City.

He previously had a private practice in Gainesville and recently opened a family-practice clinic in High Springs.

Reached at the High Springs clinic, Quintana declined comment for this story.

Madan works at Florida State Prison during the day and at an after-hours clinic in Starke at night. Reached at the Starke clinic, Madan said making a pronouncement of death doesn't mean he's involved in executions.

"People pronounce death of people they know," Madan said. "That's it � no involvement."

Ethics violation

AMA guidelines ban doctors from pronouncing death or participating in executions in any way.

The policy conflicts with Florida law, however, which says "a qualified physician shall be present and announce when death has been inflicted" in an execution.

Their presence at executions is shrouded in secrecy.

During an execution, once an inmate stops moving, execution witnesses see a hooded individual come out from behind a wall blocking the part of the death chamber where lethal drugs are administered.

The person is clad in a blue hood and goggles. The person approaches the gurney where the inmate is strapped, shines a light in the inmate's eye and places a stethoscope over the heart.

The process is then repeated by a second hooded individual. Finally, that person signals death to prison officials with a nod and the execution is officially over.

The Florida Department of Corrections confirmed this individual is a doctor. But department officials denied a public records request to identify these doctors, citing a law protecting the identities of those administering lethal injection.

The law prevents the release of "information which identifies an executioner, or any person prescribing, preparing, compounding, dispensing, or administering a lethal injection."

But the Alachua County medical examiner's office says the law covers the executioner, not the doctors who assist in the execution process.

Larry Bedore, director of investigations for the office, said the department would continue to release autopsy reports naming doctors.

"The doctor is not the executioner," he said. "It's my understanding that their sole role is to pronounce death."

State guards info

Department of Corrections spokeswoman Gretl Plessinger said revealing the identities of doctors could lead to threats against them.

"Disclosing this information could expose these individuals to retribution or personal danger," she said in a written statement. "To that end, we will neither confirm nor deny the role of any person as it relates to executions."

Department Secretary James McDonough declined to comment on the issue.

Fordham University law professor Deborah Denno has studied the lethal injection procedure and involvement of doctors in executions. She found states closely guard the identities of these doctors, citing security concerns she said are unfounded.

She said she's never found anything but minor threats against doctors involved in executions.

"You're talking about a country where most of the public is still in favor of the death penalty," she said.

Allen, the UF bioethics program director, said some doctors might be willing to pronounce death at executions but worry about how patients and other doctors will react.

Doctors typically "want to keep the role of healer distinct," Allen said.

Role of doctors

Current department procedures, adopted in August, are vague about whether doctors have roles beyond declaring death in executions.

But a previous version of the execution procedure, which was outlined by the state in the case of executed inmate Terry Sims, sheds more light on the issue.

A pharmacist prepares the lethal drugs and a physician stands behind the executioner while the drugs are administered, according to court records. These steps take place out of the sight of execution witnesses.

In addition, court records say a physician's assistant observes the execution and certifies the inmate's death and that a nurse or medical technician can be present in the witness room.

Plessinger said these procedures are still used for the most part other than the fact a doctor, not a physician's assistant, pronounces death in executions. Denno conducted a 2003 study on the death penalty. She found 13 of 39 states with lethal injection have procedures requiring doctors to pronounce death.

Some states also require medical personnel to insert the IV, but she said states provide little information about whether doctors go beyond those duties.

But she said court challenges to lethal injection in other states have revealed doctors are sometimes asked to participate in executions in ways not described in procedures.

"It appears that physicians get involved more than we considered," she said.

Other states

Diaz's botched execution led the state to stop executions while a commission studies the procedure.

Judging from the experience of other states, Florida may have a tough road reviving the procedure if medical involvement becomes an issue.

Eight states � Arkansas, California, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri and South Dakota � at least temporarily halted executions last year because of court challenges or other problems with lethal injection.

Just last week, North Carolina joined that list. A judge put two executions on hold there as the state struggles with the role doctors should play in carrying out the death penalty.

Like Florida, North Carolina state law requires a doctor's presence at executions. But a state medical board declared last week that any participation by a physician violated medical ethics.

The state decided a nurse and medical technician � rather than a doctor � would use brain and heart monitors to determine when an inmate dies. But the judge ruled that under a 1909 law, the governor and the nine other statewide office holders must approve the change.

Others states have faced similar controversies.

In Missouri, a court halted executions last summer after the doctor who supervised lethal injections admitted he was dyslexic and sometimes improvised the mix of lethal drugs.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch later identified the doctor, reporting he'd been sued for malpractice more than 20 times and denied staff privileges by two hospitals.

The court ordered that executions couldn't resume until the state found an anesthesiologist to oversee them, which hasn't yet happened.

In California, a judge ordered anesthesiologists to take part in an execution last February.

But the doctors dramatically withdrew at the last minute, citing concerns about the ethics of their involvement.

The judge later stopped all executions in the state because of concerns the lack of doctor involvement could lead to a violation of the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

Plested, the AMA president, said doctors should refuse even limited roles in executions.

Even seemingly small tasks for doctors may lead to greater participation in executions, he said.

"Once you put your toe in the water, so to speak, you might find you're becoming complicit," Plested said.



Nathan Crabbe can be reached at 338-3176 or crabben@gvillesun.com.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Email: fordhamlawyer@law.fordham.edu

Florida State Prison gassing lawsuit

BUTLER v. McDONOUGH (M.D.Fla. 2006)

SYLVESTER BUTLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JAMES McDONOUGH, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:04-cv-917-J-32MMH.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division.
BUTLER v. McDONOUGH (M.D.Fla. 2006)

SYLVESTER BUTLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JAMES McDONOUGH, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:04-cv-917-J-32MMH.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division.

Florida State Prison Pepper Spray lawsuit



http://www.angelfire.com/fl4/fci/pepperspraysuit.html